My Profile

Keep Up to Date:
Blog RSS
Blog
Forum RSS
Forum
Post New Topic Post Reply
Posted 2 Months, 3 Weeks ago
sailormars
Expert Boarder
Posts: 106
graphgraph
User Offline
 
I haven't posted here before, but here's a list of one person's opinions.

Chris - 'What a Wonderful World'

Chris picked the easiest song - 'What a Wonderful World' is harmonically and melodically much simpler than most songs considered standards; it is probably a standard simply by virtue of Armstrong's sublime version. Chris had the benefit of low expectations. Much like George Bush in a debate, he simply has to get through the thing in order for it to be considered a smashing success. He didn't hit any particularly bad notes - the song was, after all, written for a 67-year-old in poor health, and doesn't require much of a range. Chris showed his usual querulous voice and uncontrolled vibrato, and his interpretation was limited to looking slightly less angry than usual. But he didn't put the song across in any kind of a fashion, he didn't show the joy that this song conveys. I found it funny - this very angry person with short-man's complex singing about how wonderful the world is, clutching the mic like a drowning man, while his while his face is longing to contort itself back into alt-rock angst (or 'heavy metal', as Grandpa Rod called it).

The judges of course said it was marvelous. I don't understand why. Chris is unsaleable, I think. There has never been an alternative rock solo singer. You have to be part of a band. And you have to write songs. I don't get this whole AI-rocker thing - rock stars are cool, and AI is by definition not cool. There are so many people who can sing as well as Chris in this idiom (I played in and recorded rock bands for years). What differentiates them from each other, and determines who make it and who doesn't, is not the quality of the vocals, but the quality of the songs that the band writes.

Paris - 'These Foolish Things'

This was an excellent performance. A few minor pitch problems but otherwise really excellent. Often, she sounds a lot like Billie (her 'Take Five' audition) but here she sounded a little more like Ella - she had a little of the bell-like quality that gave Ella the most beautiful *sounding* voice ever. Hard to say anything except 'well done' to this. Contrasting this to Chris, it's obvious that Paris can actually sing and Chris is simply a hack. Paris can sing with a clear, straight voice and open up the vibrato, close it down, and it's all under control. These are the kind of techniques that only she and Katherine (and perhaps Elliot) have, and they're the ones that differentiate a professional from an amateur.

Taylor - 'You Send Me'

I was once watching Taylor, and my wife walked in. I said 'look, Father Ted's on American Idol'. My wife said 'Don't be stupid. Father Ted dances much better than that.' And he did, on the Elvis impersonation episode.

Taylor really isn't bad. He is an excellent musician, and a good entertainer. He knows how to build a song up and down. Unfortunately, he just wasn't blessed with the kind of raw instrument that some of the others were. His voice, in isolation from the performance, just isn't that round and doesn't have that much character. Compare his version of 'Taking it to the Streets' with Michael McDonald's (whose perpetually tortured tone was responsible for the artistic demise and commercial success of the Doobies). McDonald has a richness to his voice, overtones and harmonics that Taylor just doesn't have. It's not his fault, and it's not something he can do anything about.

Anyway, this song isn't a standard. It's a soul classic, but not a standard. Taylor did it pretty well, the way Taylor does things. He's going to win AI running away. he's not a great singer, but he fakes it well.

Elliot - 'It Had to Be You'

Very good. It's obvious he has an affinity for this type of music. Elliot has the best sounding voice in the competition in terms of richness and pure quality. He has good control, as well, but a couple of others have more. Sometimes his vibrato gets out of control and he gives the impression that the song is getting away from him. I get the impression that he's had less training than a lot of others and he could be really, really good with time.

Unfortunately, while this was a very good performance, it was slightly understated and artistic, something to avoid with AI, where you've got 2 minutes to wow the audience with something as dramatic as you can. If in doubt, go over the top. While this would have been a great performance in the context of someone performing multiple songs in a complete performance, I'm not sure it was the right thing here. And Elliot suffers from great expectations - we expected him to do well here, and I'm not sure that simply providing us with excellent intonation and control, good interpretation, musicality etc is enough to save Elliot, while the likes of Chris and Kellie simply have to avoid falling on their faces.

Kellie - 'Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered'

The intro was interesting. Rod's always looking for a new ex-wife and it looks like he might have found one. Kellie found a way to make a highly suggestive malapropism, as usual. When I first saw Kellie, I thought that she was either as dumb as rocks, or as smart as Sacha Cohen, the guy who plays Ali G. I'm leaning towards the latter, now. I don't think that there's anything wrong with being a fake - that's what a performer is supposed to be.

Kellie had very low expectations and managed to not meet them. Interestingly, it was bad in ways I didn't expect. It wasn't that pitchy to me - there was one egregiously flat note she pulled up from. She was pulling away from the piano at the start. Like we've seen a couple of times before, she can't wait for this thing to be over. The pianist could follow her when solo at the beginning, but once the band came in the bandleader couldn't keep them up with her, and rather than try and risk the band looking bad, he elected to wave bye-bye to Kellie as she disappeared over the hill. At one time a band could have followed her, but that's not something people do anymore because nearly everything is done to electronic cues. That's absolutely no excuse for Kellie, though.

My theory is that she simply doesn't understand this music enough to realise that she's out of sync with the arrangement. Like many this week, 'Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered' is a more complex song than it sounds (7b9's and dim's all over the place, and that lovely Dmmaj7/Dm7/Dm6 run). I don't think that she has a good enough ear to hear where she was wrong.

The judges, of course, as they always do for her, said 'wrong song'. It was, in that it wasn't 'Twinkle twinkle little star' or 'suds in the bucket'. But every time she screws up, it's the song's fault.

Ace - 'That's All'

According to this week's lascivious geriatric croaker offering advice, Ace did the song even better than Rod. Well, if he couldn't better Rod's anodyne versions of the standards then he shouldn't be here. I don't believe that anyone buying Rod's jazz-lite albums can have ever been exposed to anyone else doing these songs.

Ace, surprisingly, wasn't too bad. His pitching was better than usual. He has two main faults - he is too nasal for part of his range, and he completely goes out of control at the lower part of his range. Both of these problems are because he can't support his chest voice properly. This guy basically has never learned to sing properly, and that's a problem for him. If I was recording Ace I would either use a different microphone or EQ curve to try to minimize the nasal quality.

But this week wasn't bad at all by his standards. I expect him to go home after this.

Katharine - 'Someone to Watch Over Me'

I must admit, I am at a complete loss to understand how anyone could disagree that she was the best singer in the competition this year. She has perfect control. Sometimes she goes a little screechy at the top, but she certainly didn't this week. This is a very, very difficult song (Gershwin makes Rodgers and Hart seem as simple as 'Suds in the bucket' that she performed absolutely perfectly. It was as good a performance as some of Clay Aitkin's, previously the gold standard for perfect execution on AI. I was almost tempted to vote. This girl has everything - it was a great performance of a great song by any standards. A great way to round off what was clearly the best week this season.

In order: 1. Katherine 2. Paris 3. Elliot (gap) 4. Taylor (gap) 5. Ace 6. Chris 7. Kellie

Who should go: Kellie Who will go: Ace
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 2 Months, 3 Weeks ago
RICHARDGATZ
Expert Boarder
Posts: 91
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Nice to have a thoughtful and knowledgeable post. I have two minor quibbles.

Not really a particularly good or interesting voice. Certainly not as distinctive as Mel Torme's, but a voice which might record well and appeal to a good-sized if moderately narrow market. (I suspect he would do better in Europe than here.) He certainly doesn't have Torme's musical chops, but who did.

You can't EQ in what isn't there. (The rabbit first has to be in the hat.) Ace needs to learn how to lower his larynx and keep it there. The reason his 'chest register' is wonkie is because the principle resonating space for it is attenuated, i.e., his adam's apple is in the elevated (juvenile) position. Learning to breath properly for singing would certainly help him with this problem.

On the basis of this performance yes, on the basis of commercial viability, no.

The Other Mickey
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 2 Months, 3 Weeks ago
dh/dt
Expert Boarder
Posts: 109
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Talk about someone who has perfect pitch. Clay Aiken is the only contestant on AI - *EVER* - who *NEVER* hit a single wrong note. The worse he ever did was forget the words to 'Vincent' - and even that he covered well and professionally.

Katherin comes close, but I've heard a few clunkers out of her this season.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 2 Months, 3 Weeks ago
bhargav0303
Expert Boarder
Posts: 97
graphgraph
User Offline
 
As I stated in an earlier thread, these malapropisms seem so rehearsed, I think they're being written for her by the producers. They are not doing her any favors.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 2 Months, 3 Weeks ago
calgal415
Expert Boarder
Posts: 85
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Bad note......maybe not. Wrong songs....plenty! Overenunciate.....you bet! Dressed badly.....oh yeah! Sang every song the same......you bet!

Katharine had 7 clunkers just last night alone!
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 2 Months, 3 Weeks ago
lakeswalker
Expert Boarder
Posts: 113
graphgraph
User Offline
 
My how transparently homeresque.

No one was perfect last night, but I guess we can all safely assume that your clunkometer strangely malfunctioned during your favorite's performance or everyone else other than Katharine's. Must be a hell of bar tab you're running BTW, what's a clunker? Not in any of my text books.

The Other Mickey
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 2 Months, 3 Weeks ago
swissgazer
Expert Boarder
Posts: 106
graphgraph
User Offline
 
I agree - it couldn't have been less subtle had Dolly Parton herself stated it.

I don't know - Pickler has a decent enough voice, that with professional coaching and post' could be made to sell C&W albums; but C&W is also a lot about personality, probably moreso than most other muscial genres - look at what happened to those fun-lovin' C&W darlin's, The Dixie Chicks, once their conservative fanbase got wind of Natalie's remarks re:Bush. Uh-Glee.

Producers can compensate for a so-so voice, but the personality has to be there - Kellie's 'bumpkin' act will go a long way in the C&W market.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 2 Months, 3 Weeks ago
Brian Albin
Expert Boarder
Posts: 109
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Well, yes. He's good by the standards of AI, but bad by the standards of Mel Torme. I agree with you that his commercial possibilities are somewhat limited.

I wouldn't try to EQ anything in, I'd try EQ'ing some stuff out. The first thing I'd try is a mic with some roll-off - a ribbon mic or something like that. If that didn't work I'd try scooping the high mids or low highs (say 2Khz) and boosting around 800Hz.

There's no doubt that this wouldn't be nearly as effective as teaching him to sing properly. But sometimes you just have to work with what you've got. I recorded a very nasally girl recently and was able to mitigate it somewhat by using a Beyer ribbon mic and some (good) broad EQ. It was still nasal, just not as bad.

You're probably right. I know little about the C&W market or how important being able to sing is to an artist's marketability there. One of the wisest things anyone said to me was that the sign of a good musical education was to be able to recognize what's good about music you don't like. Carrie Underwood could definitely sing far more competently than Kellie - though I hated the tone of her voice, she had good control and intonation.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 2 Months, 3 Weeks ago
sailormars
Expert Boarder
Posts: 106
graphgraph
User Offline
 
The problem Ace has is a lack of energy in the band of the fundamental pitch. With his Adam's apple around his ears, the first and second have almost merged. There is no tonal body there to reveal once you carve away the noise.

Try to get a hold of a Coles ribbon or one of the clones of the old RCAs that Wes Dooley(?) was building. Failing that, an EV re20 or Shure SM7 can help smooth out a difficult to tame female voice. (I understand the EV has been used to good effect on Bonnie Raitt and others.) I've even heard of engineers aiming a mike at the back of the head of folk with really foul voices and ending up with pretty decent results.

The Other Mickey
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
Copyright © 2006 - Nov 2008 Celebrity Gossip 101